House introduces bill to prevent CIRCLA regulation of manure
WASHINGTON — The National Cattlemen’s Beef Association applauded the introduction of bipartisan legislation in the U.S. House of Representatives on March 14 that would prevent 200,000 farms and ranches from being regulated as if they were toxic Superfund sites.
The bill, introduced by U.S. Reps. Billy Long, R-Mo., and Jim Costa, D-Calif., is known as the Agricultural Certainty for Reporting Emissions (ACRE) Act and is supported by 85 original co-sponsors.
“There’s not a lot of bipartisan consensus on Washington, D.C., these days, but one thing that a lot of folks on both sides of the aisle can agree on is that the CERCLA law that regulates toxic Superfund sites shouldn’t apply to animal agricultural operations,” said fifth-generation California rancher and NCBA President Kevin Kester. “CERCLA was never intended to regulate cow manure, and Congress should fix this situation as soon as possible.”
Similar bipartisan legislation — the Fair Agricultural Reporting Method (FARM) Act — was introduced in the U.S. Senate by U.S. Sen. Deb Fischer, R-Neb., and Joe Donnelly, D-Ind., on Feb. 13. That bill currently has 37 co-sponsors and could be marked up by the Senate’s Environment and Public Works Committee as soon as next week.
The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act was enacted to provide for cleanup of the worst industrial chemical toxic waste dumps and spills, such as oil spills and chemical tank explosions. CERCLA was never intended to govern agricultural operations, for whom emissions from livestock are a part of everyday life.
To make this clear, in 2008, the Environmental Protection Agency finalized a rule to clarify that farms were exempt from CERCLA reporting and small farms, in particular, were exempt from EPCRA reporting, given that low-level livestock emissions are not the kind of “releases” that congress intended to manage with these laws.
Upon being sued in 2009 by environmental advocacy groups, the Obama Administration’s EPA defended the exemption in court on the grounds that CERCLA and EPCRA do not explicitly exempt farms because congress never believed that agriculture would be covered under these statutes, so a specific statutory exemption was not viewed to be necessary.
Unfortunately, in April 2017, the D.C. Circuit Court vacated the EPA’s 2008 exemption, putting nearly 200,000 farms and ranches under the regulatory reporting authorities enshrined in CERCLA and EPCRA. The new reporting requirements could have gone into effect on Jan. 22, but the Court delayed implementation of the requirements until May 1, 2018, which gives Congress time to act.
Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.
User Legend: Moderator Trusted User
On Tuesday, May 17, a Montana Circuit Court agreed that approval of continued grazing in the Upper Green River area did not violate the Endangered Species Act and ruled that the Fish and Wildlife Service…