Is silage an option for corn Impacted by canal breach? | TheFencePost.com

Is silage an option for corn Impacted by canal breach?

Karla Wilke
Cow/Calf, Stocker Management Specialist
Nebraska Extension

The July 17 breach of the Gering-Fort Laramie canal left over 100,000 acres of irrigated crops in eastern Wyoming and western Nebraska without water. Without irrigation water and adequate rainfall, taking the corn to full maturity and grain production may not be the best option for the crop.

Producers with a corn crop impacted by the canal breach may want to consider making corn silage out of this year’s crop. There are several things to consider when making the decision to make silage.

The first decision is whether to harvest grain or chop the crop for silage. In NebGuide G1865, The Use and Pricing of Drought Stressed Corn (http://extensionpublications.unl.edu/assets/pdf/g1865.pdf) producers can find a formula for estimating grain yield using 1/1000 of an acre, the number of rows in the average ear, and the number of kernels in a row of an average ear. Producers must then determine, given the cost of producing the crop and the price of corn, whether it makes economic sense to harvest the crop for grain.

The next thing a producer should do is to check the labels on any chemicals that have been applied to see if there are any restrictions on harvesting the crop for livestock.

Additionally, producers need to talk to crop adjustors, insurance agents, and Farm Service Agency employees to determine how harvesting the crop for silage instead of grain will impact payout on crop insurance or government programs.

Next producers need to estimate the tons of silage that might be produced from the drought-stricken crop. Again, as with grain yield estimates, producers can take the pounds in 1/1000 of an acre and multiply that by (1000/2000). An example for a field with 30-inch rows would be to weigh the chopped forage in a 17-foot, 5-inch row. Assuming that was 34 pounds, then 34(1000/2000) would be 17 ton/acre estimated forage. Silage is best packed at 35% dry matter (65% moisture); therefore, timing of silage harvesting and packing is critical.

There are several methods for pricing silage. Nebraska Extension Educator Aaron Berger has an article from August of 2017 on estimating the value of silage standing in the field, packed in the silo, or at the bunk when fed. The article is on-line at beef.unl.edu (https://beef.unl.edu/cattleproduction/corn-worth).

A simple method for estimating the value of the standing crop is the price of corn x 7.65. So if corn is $4 per bushel then the silage would be worth ($4 x 7.65) or $30.60 per ton at 65% moisture. However, the energy value of drought-stressed corn is often 85-95% that of traditional corn silage and must be taken into account to be fair to the party buying the silage.

Nitrates can be an issue when corn is stressed by drought. However, nitrates tend to accumulate in the lower one-third of the stalk and ensiling dissipates nitrates by 40-60%, so when sending samples to a commercial laboratory to determine nutrient quality of the ensiled forage, also ask for a nitrate analysis.

If chopping, packing, storing and feeding silage is not a routine activity in a given operation but will be utilized this year, the University of Nebraska has many good resources on preserving and feeding silage at beef.unl.edu.

Links to a few of these videos and articles:

https://beef.unl.edu/2018-silage-beef-cattle-conference

https://beef.unl.edu/cattleproduction/droughtcornsilage

https://beef.unl.edu/cattleproduction/droughtdamagedcornfields

https://beef.unl.edu/beefwatch/should-you-be-considering-silage-bags-bagged-silage-vs-silage-bunkers-piles

Harvesting silage from drought stressed corn may be an option to make the best of a challenging situation. Thoroughly evaluating all the implications of chopping corn for silage is important. Drought-stressed corn can still make excellent feed. Proper harvest, packing and storing methods will be key to reducing shrink and having good quality silage to feed. ❖