Peggy Sanders: More technology mediums, like Facebook, Twitter, email, bring extra challenges
It is unbelievable how technology has changed us. I’ve been encouraged, especially by a handful of high school classmates, to sign up for Facebook.
It will help us to stay in touch better and to find out what everyone is doing. For years we used the telephone to talk to those who live away while we actually had face to face conversations with locals.
Then, we graduated to email, which most use, but not all were agreeable to having their addresses publicized. At least that was what they said, but in truth, most classmates from forty years ago really don’t care to keep in touch.
Then there is Twitter, which I understand is a brief version of moment to moment events. One can write no more than 140 characters in a message, which is called a ‘tweet.’ I am convinced, however, it should be referred to as a ‘twit.’ Like Facebook, the hype to sign up is intense, but can be ignored.
Blogs (short for Web Log) are supposed to be added to nearly every day to be effective. Why? Supposedly each of us does so many interesting activities in our day to day lives that others cannot wait to read what we’ve done with our time.
Perhaps the readers do not have enough to do if the highlight of their day is to read that I spent more than an hour in the middle of the night rough drafting a column.
Not to mention, I would have to use my time to enter information into a blog so others could use their time to read it. Their time and mine can be put to better uses.
Even email, which I do use and is handy for writers and other business people, is still so impersonal.
These devices are all touted as a grand improvement, but nothing beats face to face contact.
I’m told that in offices, people email each other in their cubicles or between offices that are next door. Attempting to support their theory that email is great for such communication, they point out that emails leave a ‘paper trail’ of everything that is said, and a verbal conversation does not. Factually, that may be true, but the importance of watching the nuances of someone’s facial expressions as they converse cannot be overcome. Human contact is needed.
The cell phone is useful around the ranch and farm and I appreciate that technology.
Many years ago we tried the two-way radios and they were not successful in our situation. Cells have saved all of us miles and hours since our work is spread out over several tracts of land.
Personally, I consider them to be safety devices. Breaking down and needing assistance or being injured makes having a cell along a tremendous advantage.
My favorite vision is of a horseback cowboy using his cell phone. He may be making a date or talking to his commodities broker, yet he has combined doing things the conventional way with the new technology, making use of his time on both counts.
Still, my internet latchstring is always out via email@example.com.
Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.
User Legend: Moderator Trusted User
A new book describing the events leading up to the Beef Checkoff’s implementation and outlining a vast number of happenings since then has caused quite a stir.