Speakers talk about sharing and protecting animal agriculture’s roots
Speakers shared how farmers ranchers and the animal agriculture industry can share their roots with the public while also protecting against extreme animal rights activism at the Animal Agriculture Alliance’s 2018 Stakeholders Summit, themed “Protect Your Roots,” at the Renaissance Capital View Hotel in Arlington, Va.
One way the animal agriculture industry can share their roots is by engaging with media about what they do on their farm or in their company. Jenny Splitter, a freelance food, science and health writer, Tamara Hinton, senior vice president of Story Partners and Phil Brasher, senior editor of AgriPulse gave recommendations to help farmers and ranchers cultivate relationships with journalists and reporters.
“Facts and figures go a long way, but you also need to cultivate the relationships so the media knows who to call,” Hinton said. “You should thank them when you see good coverage. Send them a note of appreciation. A thank you goes a long way.”
Splitter recommended acknowledging that there are different points of view. “Don’t pretend like your opinion or viewpoint is the only one,” she said. “There’s always a risk when you put your company or farm out there. Journalists are not there to market agriculture, but they do want to hear all sides.”
Brasher encouraged attendees to always make an effort to respond in a timely manner to media. “When you don’t respond, your viewpoint doesn’t get told,” Brasher said. “Even when you don’t want to respond or be in the story, go ahead and respond just to say that. You get a reputation for not responding.”
Next, Randall Singer, DVM, PhD, from the University of Minnesota presented new research about “raised without antibiotics” (RWA) policies and their potential to impact animal welfare. “Ensuring the safety, health and overall well-being of animals raised for food is an ethical obligation — I say that as both a veterinarian and a consumer,” Singer said.
The research revealed the major reason for adopting an RWA policy is to fill a customer or client request and the reason why some companies and farms were not participating in an RWA program is due to concern about the negative impacts to animal health and welfare. There are “significant health and welfare challenges associated with raised without antibiotics,” Singer said.
To kick off the second day of Summit, Nicole Drumhiller, PhD, of American Military University and Jason Roesler, director of public affairs at Fur Commission USA, shared experiences of animal rights extremism.
In 2003, Roesler’s family was targeted by animal rights activists on their mink ranch in Washington. More than 11,000 animals were released causing more than a million dollars in damages, 2,000 animals were lost or deceased and 22 generations worth of records were destroyed. Community and personal relationships were also damaged. “We had our peace of mind, privacy and security attacked,” Roesler said.
Drumhiller discussed a research study in which she interviewed 86 people, 78 percent of which self-identified as farmers or ranchers regarding their attitudes and experiences about being threatened by extreme animal rights activists. Twenty-four percent of respondents said they had received death threats and 46 percent received other types of threats such as, taking pictures of their children’s school, leaving voicemails threatening to “take a knife to their throat,” bomb their office and burn their homes, according to Drumhiller.
“Issues of biosecurity and agroterrorism are currently being discussed by animal rights activists,” Roesler said. “Animal agriculture must stand united. These groups are looking for the total abolition of using animals.”
Next, Jamie Jonker, PhD, of National Milk Producers Federation, Bryan Humphreys of Ohio Pork Council and Scott Sobel with kglobal shared lessons learned from responding to activist tactics.
Humphreys suggested opening up the barn doors and the lines of communication within your community. “As questions are answered, there tends to be a lot less animosity towards animal agriculture.”
Jonker shared how brands are also the targets of activist tactics with the short-term goal of activists being to put an individual farm out of business while the long-term goal is to not have the brand sell the protein altogether. “Working with customers and helping them to understand the production process helps both the brands and the animal agriculture industry,” Jonker said.
Preparation is the best defense, according to Sobel. “If you wait to react to the attack, you’ve waited too long,” Sobel said. “You’ll be the target instead of the arrow, but you can flip that if you prepare.”
Dietitians Leah McGrath and Amy Myrdal Miller took the stage next to dissect the rise of the “plant-based” diet. Myrdal Miller explained there is “not a real consensus on what ‘plant-based’ actually means. Some believe it can include animal protein and others do not.”
McGrath urged attendees to remember that “the loudest voice in the room may not be your customer and doesn’t necessarily represent the majority of customers” and “don’t be afraid to push back and stand up to incorrect information” about food and nutrition.
To close the Summit, Frank Mitloehner, PhD, of University of California, Davis, busted myths about animal agriculture’s impact on the environment. A few key statistics Mitloehner shared included: all of United States agriculture constitutes 9 percent of greenhouse gas emissions and all of livestock contributing 3.8 percent, not 51 percent like some like to claim.
“When you hear things that sound fishy, don’t just let them go. We have done it too many times,” Mitloehner said. “If we don’t answer their questions, someone else will. We have to be ready to engage with the public. Not just academics, but farmers too.”
Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.
User Legend: Moderator Trusted User
The House passed S.4054, the Grain Standards Reauthorization Act of 2020, by voice vote.