Dairy defined: FDA doesn’t know where to go on fake dairy? we’ve got a map | TheFencePost.com

Dairy defined: FDA doesn’t know where to go on fake dairy? we’ve got a map

National Milk Producers Federation

ARLINGTON, Va. — More than one year after comments closed on the Food and Drug Administration’s request for information on fake-milk labeling; with health organizations warning against inappropriate consumption of plant-based beverages; with a rising number of lawmakers asking why nothing’s been done; and with a new FDA commissioner who seems to understand the problem, FDA still hasn’t resolved the public-health issue of mislabeled plant-based products using dairy terms that imply nutritional equivalence to consumers.

Why not?

That would be for FDA to answer. But if the concern is that FDA’s beginning to enforce its own longstanding rules may create confusion, we have an answer for that: a road map that updates dairy-labeling rules, clarifies marketplace practices and ensures fair competition among dairy and plant-based products. Written as a Citizen Petition responding to the comments FDA solicited, the map is National Milk Producers Federation’s proposed solution to the fake-dairy labeling problem — and it includes a few nuggets that might surprise consumers whose new diets include too much plant-based misinformation. For example:

The petition would clarify that milk from animals other than cows, such as sheep, goats and water buffalo, are acceptable for dairy labeling, because milk only comes from mammals.

Support Local Journalism

It explains why terms like “Peanut Butter” and “Milk of Magnesia” are compatible with current FDA rules, while calling an almond-based beverage “milk” isn’t. (Short answer: It has to do with a product’s established use — these products aren’t marketed as substitutes for dairy.)

It even reaffirms circumstances under which plant-based products could still use dairy terms, and it clearly does not ban the use of those dairy terms if used in a way that fits with with decades-old federal regulations that are consistent with the First Amendment. Words such as “alternative,” “imitation” and “substitute,” properly administered, can give consumers the information they need and maintain nutrition and labeling integrity, while allowing plant-based purveyors the leeway to market their heavily processed, flavored sugar waters largely how they’d like.

Finally, the road map contains a detailed analysis of relevant case law to address First Amendment concerns over labeling terms. It surveys the legal landscape to ensure that solutions on disclosure requirements are narrowly tailored to improving labeling transparency and promoting informed consumer choice. It emphatically does not propose a blanket ban on the use of dairy terms by plant-based products.

Dairy farmers understand the FDA has a lot on its plate. But after more than 40 years of non-enforcement — and a nearly two-year-old pledge to act — let’s get real. The path is clear, the road map exists. All that’s left is action – by FDA, Congress, or both — to do what’s right for consumers. We won’t be quiet until it’s done. ❖

Support Local Journalism

Readers like you make the Fence Post’s work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.

Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.

Each donation will be used exclusively for the development and creation of increased news coverage.


Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.